
| TVEITT: Piano Concerto No. 4, Op. 130
"Aurora Borealis." Variations on a Folksong from
Hardanger for two pianos and orchestra. Håvard Gimse and Gunilla Süssmann, pianos; Royal Scottish National Orch/Bjarte Engeset, cond. NAXOS 8.555761 (B) (DDD) TT: 60:51 Music poured from modern Norwegian composer Geirr Tveitt like a flood.
About 80% of his output went up in a house fire (Norwegian houses are
built mostly out of wood). Of his six piano concertos, two have completely
disappeared and probably won't ever be recovered. A major composition
turned up literally in a bag of trash Tveitt had forgotten to dump.
Tveitt's hanging over oblivion's abyss by a toenail. His music, like his
great forerunner Grieg's, is noteworthy more for its melodic and harmonic
invention than for its formal construction. That is, although the music
yields rewards to analysis, that's not really what strikes you about it.
Certainly, both pieces here move in straightforward ways.
The Variations (1939) are (of course) variations (somewhere around
thirty of them), with no attempt to build a quasi-symphonic movement as in
the Brahms Haydn-Variationen. The theme sounds clearly in the bass
clarinet at the outset, and the composer takes off from there. Turns of
melody characteristic of Grieg will catch the ear of the alert Grieg
aficionado, which probably means that Hardanger folk music inspired both
composers. Although Tveitt devotes a lot of care to transitions between
one variation and the next, throughout it's the individual variation which
holds the listener's attention, rather than a gradually-unfolding
argument. Furthermore, no variation strays far from the theme. That Tveitt
commands the listener's interest over a 30-minute span testifies to his
powers of invention. For example, in the third variation, the composer
gets the theme going simultaneously at "regular" tempo and twice
as slow. Furthermore, the ideas of one variation often pop up in another,
so much so that I began to wonder if the piece were somehow palindromic
(conclusion: not according to me). The liner notes talk of Tveitt's
"intricate" planning, but I doubt it. Other works show him
capable of it, but here I think the method more dynamically
"associative" than consciously worked out. The idiom straddles
late Romanticism and early Modernism. In that way, it reminds me a lot of
the Rachmaninov of the Symphonic Dances and the Paganini Rhapsody.
If you have no problems with those works, this one will go down easy. It's
a big ol' Romantic blow-out of a piece. The fourth piano concerto, composed ten years later, is
a different kettle of fishmore obviously Modern (with a capital M),
more formally
distinct, although the Romantic impulse behind the music remains. Tveitt
apparently loved watching the stars. From his home, he could actually see
the aurora borealis and dragged mattresses outside so he and his kids
could lie on their backs and gaze at the sky. His infatuation resulted
in a masterpiece, formally intricate and poetic as well. The concerto consists of the standard three movements,
though not in a standard order. The first movement, subtitled "The
Northern Lights awakening above the autumn colors," begins slowly
and quietly with an
"awakening" downward pentatonic run. In short order, two main
thematic cells appear, and these generate most of the matter of a modified
sonata movement. Tveitt concerns himself mostly with continual variation
and fragmentation of these basic ideas, so much so that he really seems
to be working with intervals (minor thirds and major and minor seconds)
rather than with even cells as such. The piano has a mainly heroic part,
and the music shows mainly a hard, glittery edge. The second movement,
"Glittering in the winter heavens, and ...," a modified scherzo,
again opens with a pentatonic theme. Indeed, a pentatonic scale generates
most of the themes of the first part of the movement. Gradually, however,
the scales fill in, and more and more chromatic twists and turns show up.
The minor thirds and major and minor seconds have more and more to say
about thematic content. Tveitt wrote the solo part for himself, one of
the great virtuosi of his time. The movement expresses "glittering"
and fleetness. "Fading away in the bright night of spring," the
finale, is unusuallya slow movement which begins with an extremely
long tune starting from a beautiful, shimmering major-seventh chord.
Indeed, it's one long tune after another, but the general thematic shapes
from the previous movements show up here as well. There's a wonderful,
nocturnal horn melody made up of perfect fourth intervals which manages
to avoid sounding Hindemithian and comes across as the instrument singing
beautifully. The movement ends with major-seventh harmonies that began
it. It's awfully hard for me to say how the performers do, if I consider
what an ideal performance might be like. It's certainly a good,
professional, straight-ahead job. However, consider that this is the only
recording. Who knows what Zimerman and the Berlin Philharmonic could do
with it (not that it's likely to happen in my lifetime)? Meanwhile, Gimse
and Engeset convey the stature of both pieces and make a case for Tveitt
as an important twentieth-century voice. If you like Rachmaninov and
Prokofiev, odds are you'll like Tveitt, and Naxos as usual makes it easy
to experiment. S.G.S. (Oct. 2002)
|