S. WAGNER: Der Schmied von Marienburg (The Smith of Marienburg).
Karl Schneider (Muthart, the smith); Anne Wieben (Frau Madaldrut, his mother);
Maacha Deubner (Wanhilt, his wife); Johannes Föttinger (Martin,
his apprentice); Ralf Sauerbrey (Willekin, a town councilor); Rebecca
Broberg (Friedelind, his daughter); Anton Leiß-Huber (Alfred, knight
and Friedelind's lover); Marek Kalbus (Heinrich Reuß von Plauen,
Grand Master of the Knights Templar); Christoph von Weitzel (Helwich
von Hartenstein, Wanhilt's father and traitor); Johann Winzer (the lame
wanderer). PPP Music Theatre Ensemble, Munich; Baltic Philharmonic Orchestra,
Gdan´sk/Frank Strobel.
Marco Polo 8.225346-48 () (DDD) TT: 188:56 (3 CDs)
Three hours of my life I can never get back. Siegfried Wagner had all
sorts of expectations heaped on him because he was Richard's son. He
decided
to become a composer and wrote a heap of operas, not one of which has
held the stage. Like his father, he wrote his own libretti. One refrains
from
comparing him with Papa, but comparisons inevitably arise, particularly
because he works in Richard's idiom -- curiously, not that of the late
operas, but somewhere around Tannhäuser and Lohengrin. This opera,
by the way, appeared in 1920.
Does this in itself matter? Not really. I don't believe in the commandment,
Thou shalt be Modern. How well Siegfried uses his inheritance does. He
does have dramatic instincts. At least his text defines characters. The
music of this opera, however, comes across as one undifferentiated wash
of sound. The 13-minute overture lacks any distinctive melodic material,
although it's well-orchestrated. In fact, the same applies to the rest
of the opera, as far as I'm concerned. The libretto contains its share
of howlers, but so do a lot of Verdis, Puccinis, and R. Wagners, for
that matter. More important, however, is the fact that a great opera
composer
practices dramatic economy. The plot overall can be convoluted, but the
scene has got to move swiftly from point to point. The son simply has
problems telling a good story. In most operas simple relationships draw
characters
together. For example, in Porgy and Bess, an opera with at least as many
characters as Der Schmied, the operatic action gets defined by only four:
Porgy, Crown, and Sportin' Life, as they vie for Bess. In Gianni
Schicchi,
the horde of Donati's relatives oppose Schicchi and the lovers. As you
might gather from Wagner's dramatis personae, relationships among characters
evade clear definition. There are at least three main plots. Most of
the time, you have no idea who belongs to what. Friedelinde is Willekin's
daughter,
Alfred's love, and has something to do with the traitor Helwich. Wanhilt
is Helwich's daughter and Muthart's wife. Add to this a plot about the
Knights Templar vs. the Lizard League (no kidding!) and a lame wanderer
-- shades of Wotan -- who's actually Mephistopheles in disguise and pretty
soon memorizing the characters in War and Peace seems as easy as scratching
your rump. Because of the plot heading off in so many directions, Siegfried's
scenes stick at one level and barely move at all. I believe this also
the fault of the music, which almost always drops dramatic turning points
in
favor of a one-sound-fits-all scene. I could recite the plot, but why
bother when it makes no impact in performance?
The performance doesn't convince you that the opera has suffered from
unjust neglect. It's a professional account (recorded live, like most
obscure
operas), but little more. I really complain only about the Alfred, Anton
Leiß-Huber, whose thinnish voice drowns in the orchestra. All in
all, not very exciting or interesting, except for students of decline.
S.G.S. (July 2010)
|